Trusted by these customers
- +30% to +100% increase in entry throughput
- Up to 50–80% reduction in peak queue length
- 20–60% reduction in screening time per person
Powerful metrics to reduce queue risk at venues and events in peak traffic periods
When combined, these metrics prove:
Which aligns directly with:
- Martyn’s Law
- Crowd safety
- Operational efficiency
On This Page
Why Queues Happen
Ingress fails when more people arrive than you can process
This is the fundamental equation:
Arrival Rate > Throughput = Queues
What this means in reality:
- 5,000 people arrive in 45 minutes
- Security can process 80 people per minute
Capacity = 3,600 people
Demand = 5,000 people
1,400 people have nowhere to go → queue forms
1. Peak Arrival Behaviour (Human Factor)
People don’t arrive evenly.
They arrive:
- Just before doors open
- Just before kickoff / show start
Creates a massive surge
2. Limited Throughput (System Constraint)
Every entry system has a cap:
- Security lanes = fixed capacity
- Staff = limited
- Space = constrained
You cannot scale instantly
Bags dramatically slow everything down:
- Add inspection time
- Increase variability
- Require manual handling
One bag can double processing time
4. Variability (Unpredictable Processing Time)
Not every guest takes the same time:
- Some pass instantly
- Others require secondary checks
This creates inconsistent flow, which breaks systems
5. Poor System Design (Structural Issue)
Many venues weren’t built for:
- Modern security requirements
- High-density arrival waves
- Continuous flow
Creates choke points and congestion zones
The Real Solution Principle
Ingress improves when you:
Reduce what needs to be processed
Not just process faster.
Simple Way to Think About It
Ingress is like a motorway:
- More cars than lanes → traffic jam
- Slower cars (bags) → worse congestion
You don’t fix traffic by:
- Adding more traffic lights
You fix it by:
- Reducing friction
- Increasing flow
Bottom Line
Ingress problems occur because:
Too many people + too much friction + not enough throughput
“Ingress problems happen when arrival demand exceeds processing capacity — and friction like bag checks slows throughput, causing queues to grow exponentially.”
Traditional Cloak Room vs Pre Entry Smart Lockers
Operational Impact
Case Study
Paradiso
Reduce queues
Increase Revenue
Reduce Ingress Friction – case study video
Cut staff Costs – case study pdf
7 Proven Strategies to Reduce Event Queues
1. Remove Storage from Entry
Cloakrooms create queues before entry even begins.
Fix:
- move storage outside entry flow
- eliminate manual handling
cloakroom inefficiency explained → /pain-points/cloakroom-inefficiency-events
2. Reduce Bag Volume at Entry
Bags slow security and create bottlenecks.
Fix:
- enforce bag policies
- provide alternative storage options
bag check delays explained → /pain-points/bag-check-delays-security
3. Introduce Pre-Entry Storage (Smart Lockers)
The most effective way to reduce queues is to remove bags entirely.
Result:
- faster security
- no storage queues
- improved flow
event locker systems → /solutions/event-venue-lockers
4. Increase Security Lane Efficiency
Don’t just add lanes — improve performance.
Fix:
- reduce inspection time
- remove unnecessary steps
- optimise processes
5. Separate Entry Flows
Mixing processes creates congestion.
Fix:
- separate storage, security, and ticketing
- create clear flow paths
6. Design for Peak Demand
Most events experience demand spikes.
Fix:
- plan for 60–90 minute arrival windows
- scale systems for peak load
7. Use Data to Optimise Flow
You can’t fix what you can’t measure.
Fix:
- track entry times
- analyse bottlenecks
- adjust operations
Traditional Entry
- bag checks at entry
- cloakroom queues
- slow throughput
- long external queues
Optimised Entry
- pre-entry storage
- clear security lanes
- faster throughput
- minimal queue formation
cloakroom vs lockers comparison → /comparisons/event-lockers-vs-cloakrooms

























